Purdue vs. Fairleigh Dickinson: NCAA Tournament Same Game Parlay Picks (3/17)
The Fairleigh Dickinson Knights handled the Texas Southern Tigers with ease in their First Four matchup. After the game, the team went viral for a locker room clip of them saying they think they can play with the Purdue Boilermakers. Can they actually, or are the Knights in for a rude awakening against the No. 1 seed from the Big 10?
Here is the best Purdue vs. Fairleigh Dickinson same game parlay for Friday, March 17th.
Go Premium to access our most exclusive March Madness tools and advice >>
March Madness First Round Same Game Parlay Bets
Purdue vs. Fairleigh Dickinson
FDU +22.5 (-105)
Other than the players and coaches in the FDU locker room, no one actually thinks that this team can play with the Boilermakers. However, they should be able to pick up a cover in this game. This season, Purdue has beaten exactly two teams by 23 or more points this season. That includes all of their non-conference games.
The Boilermakers can score with just about anyone in the country, and their defense can certainly frustrate, but they don't just obliterate teams like this spread suggests. It's going to be close down the stretch, but take the Knights to cover this tight line.
Under 145.5 (-110)
The Knights scored 84 points against the Tigers on Wednesday night. Their offense has been very good this season, but they are not going to have similar success in this game against the Boilermakers.
The Boilermakers have held seven of their last nine opponents to fewer than 70 points. In the non-conference, they held four of the six mid-major schools they faced to fewer than 60 points, including two to less than 50. The Boilermakers could score north of 80 in this game, but even if they do, the Knights may not clear the 60-point mark.
Zach Edey 15+ Rebounds (+180)
Edey is averaging 12.8 rebounds per game, and while he is all but certain to see his minutes reduced in this game, he should still have a monster performance on the boards. The Knights only outrebounded the Tigers 32-31 in their first game. They also gave up 10 offensive boards.
If they gave up numbers like that against the Tigers, what is going to happen when they see Edey? Edey is going to pull down the rebound on most of the Knights' missed shots, and there should even be opportunities for him to collect his own rebounds. He needs to play at least 20 minutes, but with how the Boilermakers play, it should be close enough at halftime that he sees enough minutes to hit this.
Parlay Odds: +700
More Round of 64 Best Same Game Parlays
- USC vs. Michigan State
- Creighton vs. NC State
- Miami vs. Drake
- Indiana vs. Kent State
- Saint Maryâs vs. VCU
- Kentucky vs. Providence
- Marquette vs. Vermont
- Arizona State vs. TCU
- Xavier vs. Kennesaw State
- Gonzaga vs. Grand Canyon
- Kansas State vs. Montana State
- Iowa State vs. Pittsburgh
- UC Santa Barbara vs. Baylor
- Florida Atlantic vs. Memphis
- Iona vs. UConn
Round 1 Player Prop Bet Picks & Predictions
- USC vs. Michigan State
- Xavier vs. Kennesaw State
- UC Santa Barbara vs. Baylor
- Saint Maryâs vs. VCU
- Marquette vs. Vermont
- Iowa State vs. Pittsburgh
- Creighton vs. NC State
- Iona vs. UConn
Find all of our player prop bet picks here >>
Round 1 Betting Picks & Predictions
South
East
- #8 Memphis vs. #9 Florida Atlantic
- #6 Kentucky vs. #11 Providence
- #3 Kansas State vs. #14 Montana State
- #7 Michigan State vs. #10 USC
- #2 Marquette vs. #15 Vermont
West
Midwest
Go Premium to access our most exclusive March Madness tools and advice >>
Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | RadioPublic | Breaker | Castbox | Pocket Casts
Whether you're new to sports betting or a betting pro, our Sports Betting Strategy and Advice page is for you. You can get started with our 101 section - including 10 Sports Betting Tips for Beginners - or head to more advanced strategies - like Key Numbers When Betting Against the Spread - to learn more.
Phil Wood is a featured writer at BettingPros. For more from Phil, check out his archive and follow him @Phil_Wood_Jr.